London climate war game tested a race into solar geoengineering
A London simulation showed how quickly climate-cooling research could turn into a contest between governments, NGOs, indigenous groups and tech companies.
A London climate simulation showed how hard it would be to slow a global rush into solar geoengineering, a technology meant to cool the planet but carrying major unknown risks. The exercise brought together about two dozen foreign-policy experts, scientists, military personnel, and former officials at Queen Mary University of London to role-play national governments, NGOs, indigenous groups, and tech companies. Colleen Golja, a climate researcher, said she had expected broad agreement on ethical research, but the game convinced her otherwise. The result matters for developers and companies because it highlights how fast climate-cooling research could become a geopolitical competition rather than a shared scientific project.
Why it matters
For people working in tech and climate, the exercise suggests the question is not only whether solar geoengineering should be studied, but who gets to shape that work and on what terms. That shift makes the politics around climate-cooling research harder to treat as a narrow scientific issue and easier to see as a source of conflict over control and legitimacy.
Keep or strike?
Does this story matter, or is it hype? Mark it before you see what everyone else did.
Sources
- Ars Technica